dellmunna
04-21 10:30 AM
hi gurus
I am not getting paid equivalent to what is there in my LC. Is there any
problem to get approval of my I-458?
EB3 INDIA
I-140 pending
I-458/EAD July filer
EAD RD Sep-07
I-458 pending
I am not getting paid equivalent to what is there in my LC. Is there any
problem to get approval of my I-458?
EB3 INDIA
I-140 pending
I-458/EAD July filer
EAD RD Sep-07
I-458 pending
wallpaper Blagojevich and his wife,
njboy
07-08 09:24 AM
yes, they can find out if u were on payroll and paid tax
lonedesi
07-27 12:35 PM
Because, if my applications(I-140 & I-485) reached today(Friday) I am safe as I have included the old filing fees for I-140. If the receipt date is Monday(July 30th), then USCIS would expect me to pay the new fees for I-140. Hence my concern.
2011 Rod Blagojevich was
kumar4875
04-08 08:39 AM
I am in.I am on oncall support next week.(11to17).so any time after that will be good.
more...
arc
08-10 10:00 PM
Hello
Thanks for looking at this question:
Scenario: I was working for company A on H1 (valid until 2010) and filed a GC through a company B (Head Hunter Company) for future employment, I have my 140 approved, and 485 was filed June 2007, have an EAD/AP. Got a RFE for intent of employment was satisfied with a letter from Company B that "I intend to join company B subject to my favourable adjudiciation". Company A is going under because of lack of funds.
Questions:
Now I am searching for a job, I am getting job offers.
1) Either I will do a contract through through Company B for which I do not have to anything in terms of immigration right?
2) But if I strart working for Company C's payroll then I am going to have to do an AC21 right or can I still hang on to company B.
3) If I do AC21 through company C and if the Job description is pretty close to the description on the LC then would it be okay or do I fear rejection? Or will I be asked why I did not work for the company who filed for my GC in the first place.
Please throw some light on the best option I have.
Thanks!
Thanks for looking at this question:
Scenario: I was working for company A on H1 (valid until 2010) and filed a GC through a company B (Head Hunter Company) for future employment, I have my 140 approved, and 485 was filed June 2007, have an EAD/AP. Got a RFE for intent of employment was satisfied with a letter from Company B that "I intend to join company B subject to my favourable adjudiciation". Company A is going under because of lack of funds.
Questions:
Now I am searching for a job, I am getting job offers.
1) Either I will do a contract through through Company B for which I do not have to anything in terms of immigration right?
2) But if I strart working for Company C's payroll then I am going to have to do an AC21 right or can I still hang on to company B.
3) If I do AC21 through company C and if the Job description is pretty close to the description on the LC then would it be okay or do I fear rejection? Or will I be asked why I did not work for the company who filed for my GC in the first place.
Please throw some light on the best option I have.
Thanks!
tranquilram
02-22 12:24 PM
I'm in a similar boat......
You can file after April 10 (six months to October 10), correct?
Are you planning to get your visa stamped while your are in India? The earliest date to appear for visa stamping is 90 days before the visa start date. I dont know if this rule is very strict or applicable in this case.
You can file after April 10 (six months to October 10), correct?
Are you planning to get your visa stamped while your are in India? The earliest date to appear for visa stamping is 90 days before the visa start date. I dont know if this rule is very strict or applicable in this case.
more...
ramb
09-30 06:11 PM
I'm going to Canada on vacation for 2 days. I've read that if yr I-94 is valid and even if yr visa is expired you can return to US (thru automcatic revalidation)
till
1. you have not applied for US visa in Canada
2. you dont belong to a country declared as sponsoring terrorism.
My question is if you surrender yr I-94 to a Canadian inspector while crossing in to Canada, what do you show US immigration people while coming back? Do they stamp something etc? Has anyone gone thru this or knows abt this?
Thanks
till
1. you have not applied for US visa in Canada
2. you dont belong to a country declared as sponsoring terrorism.
My question is if you surrender yr I-94 to a Canadian inspector while crossing in to Canada, what do you show US immigration people while coming back? Do they stamp something etc? Has anyone gone thru this or knows abt this?
Thanks
2010 Image: Rod Blagojevich
gk_2000
07-12 04:10 PM
Could anyone explain to me what this means (from aug visa bullettin):
Employment Third Preference Other Workers Category: Section 203(e) of the NACARA, as amended by Section 1(e) of Pub. L. 105-139, provides that once the Employment Third Preference Other Worker (EW) cut-off date has reached the priority date of the latest EW petition approved prior to November 19, 1997, the 10,000 EW numbers available for a fiscal year are to be reduced by up to 5,000 annually beginning in the following fiscal year. This reduction is to be made for as long as necessary to offset adjustments under the NACARA program. Since the EW cut-off date reached November 19, 1997 during Fiscal Year 2001, the reduction in the EW annual limit to 5,000 began in Fiscal Year 2002.
Employment Third Preference Other Workers Category: Section 203(e) of the NACARA, as amended by Section 1(e) of Pub. L. 105-139, provides that once the Employment Third Preference Other Worker (EW) cut-off date has reached the priority date of the latest EW petition approved prior to November 19, 1997, the 10,000 EW numbers available for a fiscal year are to be reduced by up to 5,000 annually beginning in the following fiscal year. This reduction is to be made for as long as necessary to offset adjustments under the NACARA program. Since the EW cut-off date reached November 19, 1997 during Fiscal Year 2001, the reduction in the EW annual limit to 5,000 began in Fiscal Year 2002.
more...
Giles08
04-01 08:15 AM
zCool, Thanks a lot!
Last Status counts situation DOES NOT apply here.
That rule applies to situations where you've gone from h1b to h4 or ead etc..
In your case, you can have as many approved h1b petitions as possible since it's really petition approved for that employer and your are merely beneficiary.
BUT you can ONLY work for 1 employer at a time..
Going by your situation.. if you have approved h1 from company B and are working with company B. THEN you are okay.. to hell with what company A may choose to do..
Last Status counts situation DOES NOT apply here.
That rule applies to situations where you've gone from h1b to h4 or ead etc..
In your case, you can have as many approved h1b petitions as possible since it's really petition approved for that employer and your are merely beneficiary.
BUT you can ONLY work for 1 employer at a time..
Going by your situation.. if you have approved h1 from company B and are working with company B. THEN you are okay.. to hell with what company A may choose to do..
hair Patricia Blagojevich, the wife
Blog Feeds
05-05 06:50 AM
The Department of State (DOS) has issued a regulation that broadens the authority of consular officers to revoke a visa at any time subsequent to issuance of the visa, including when the individual is already in the U.S. Additionally, the regulation allows consular officers and designated officials within DOS to revoke a visa provisionally while considering a final visa revocation.
This rule is effective April 27, 2011. DOS did not issue the regulation through notice and comment rulemaking on the basis that it involves a foreign affairs function of the United States and, therefore, is exempt from those procedures.
Pursuant to section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), DOS may determine that a visa should be revoked when information reveals that the applicant was originally, or has since become, ineligible or may be ineligible to possess a U.S. visa. In testimony before Congress in 2004, DOS stated that it had revoked 1,250 visas since September 11, 2001, based on information suggesting possible terrorist activities or links. Congress and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have put pressure on DOS and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to improve their policies regarding visa revocations.
If DOS revokes an individual�s visa, the information will be uploaded into the Consular Lookout and Support System (CLASS) database and the foreign national may not use the visa for travel to the U.S. Though DOS will seek to notify the traveler, the revocation is effective irrespective of whether the foreign traveler knows about the revocation.
Separately, the INA allows the government to remove (i.e. deport) an individual whose nonimmigrant visa has been revoked under section 221(i). There is no judicial review of the decision to revoke the visa, but there is judicial review in the context of a removal proceeding if the visa revocation is the sole basis for removal.
Expect more denials at the port of entry to the US by individuals not aware that their visa has been revoked. I understand the need for more security but this may not be the way to go.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2011/05/visa_denials_regulation_expand.html)
This rule is effective April 27, 2011. DOS did not issue the regulation through notice and comment rulemaking on the basis that it involves a foreign affairs function of the United States and, therefore, is exempt from those procedures.
Pursuant to section 221(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), DOS may determine that a visa should be revoked when information reveals that the applicant was originally, or has since become, ineligible or may be ineligible to possess a U.S. visa. In testimony before Congress in 2004, DOS stated that it had revoked 1,250 visas since September 11, 2001, based on information suggesting possible terrorist activities or links. Congress and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) have put pressure on DOS and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to improve their policies regarding visa revocations.
If DOS revokes an individual�s visa, the information will be uploaded into the Consular Lookout and Support System (CLASS) database and the foreign national may not use the visa for travel to the U.S. Though DOS will seek to notify the traveler, the revocation is effective irrespective of whether the foreign traveler knows about the revocation.
Separately, the INA allows the government to remove (i.e. deport) an individual whose nonimmigrant visa has been revoked under section 221(i). There is no judicial review of the decision to revoke the visa, but there is judicial review in the context of a removal proceeding if the visa revocation is the sole basis for removal.
Expect more denials at the port of entry to the US by individuals not aware that their visa has been revoked. I understand the need for more security but this may not be the way to go.
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2011/05/visa_denials_regulation_expand.html)
more...
desibechara
07-20 07:36 PM
I am keeping fingers crossed.
The Cover letter shows the confirmation with employer name and SOC code and Dallas BEC # . It says that ETA750 is enclosed which of course is mailed to lawyer.
So you mean to say that I can file another I140 just with additional information when I receive the package or wait for RFE and then send the originals.
DB
The Cover letter shows the confirmation with employer name and SOC code and Dallas BEC # . It says that ETA750 is enclosed which of course is mailed to lawyer.
So you mean to say that I can file another I140 just with additional information when I receive the package or wait for RFE and then send the originals.
DB
hot Patti Blagojevich: Wife, mom,
gregspirited
08-19 05:38 PM
Hello Guys,
I have been working with my current employer for last 3 years as Software engineer and filed for PERM last October (18th Oct 2007). My six year H1-B limit expires in January 2010.
Now I'm getting an opportunity to move into Technical Program Management internally (within the same company).
I have couple of questions based on the above scenario
1. Is it safe to take the new opportunity since I have to start over my PERM process (given the backlog in Atlanta center) and also given the amount of time left in my H1-B (approx 15 months left)?
2. If I file a new PERM application now, can I use the experience that I gained in this company as part of the app OR should I use only my previous employer's experience (which was 3-4 years ago and has little relation with what I might do in program management) for the PERM app?
Your replies are greatly appreicated and thanks for your time
I have been working with my current employer for last 3 years as Software engineer and filed for PERM last October (18th Oct 2007). My six year H1-B limit expires in January 2010.
Now I'm getting an opportunity to move into Technical Program Management internally (within the same company).
I have couple of questions based on the above scenario
1. Is it safe to take the new opportunity since I have to start over my PERM process (given the backlog in Atlanta center) and also given the amount of time left in my H1-B (approx 15 months left)?
2. If I file a new PERM application now, can I use the experience that I gained in this company as part of the app OR should I use only my previous employer's experience (which was 3-4 years ago and has little relation with what I might do in program management) for the PERM app?
Your replies are greatly appreicated and thanks for your time
more...
house Wife Defends Blagojevich
lazycis
12-20 09:22 AM
She's done it aready. Why worry about the future? I do not see a problem with switching from B2 to H1. Hope she was not working while on B2 :)
tattoo As Rod Blagojevich waits to
gbof
09-01 04:37 PM
Please click on the poll for data gathering purposes.
Please select as many options as required.
Thanks for starting this poll.
'Lucky Sept Guys' CONGRATS on getting greened. Please, take a moment to enter info in this poll
Please select as many options as required.
Thanks for starting this poll.
'Lucky Sept Guys' CONGRATS on getting greened. Please, take a moment to enter info in this poll
more...
pictures Patti and Rod Blagojevich
flash.stoffer
08-07 11:33 AM
Thanks.. icleric ;)
Rigth now, I'm creating a new stamp :thumb:
Rigth now, I'm creating a new stamp :thumb:
dresses Blagojevich Wife
jliechty
June 11th, 2005, 08:22 PM
Did I get your attention? If you're under 18, you may only scroll down for the first three pictures... ;)
Anyway, on Thursday I got a Nikon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 AF-S zoom and Tamron 90mm f/2.8 macro from KEH, as well as a Hoya polarizer in 67mm from B&H for the zoom (really wanted an IR filter, but the polarizer would be more useful most of the time). I also got an Epson R200, but that's a story for another time. Since the best part of digital photography is sharing pictures, I thought I'd do just that... :D
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/1381/new_lenses.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/1440/sheltie.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/1286/strawberry.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/1440/insects.jpg
Anyway, on Thursday I got a Nikon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 AF-S zoom and Tamron 90mm f/2.8 macro from KEH, as well as a Hoya polarizer in 67mm from B&H for the zoom (really wanted an IR filter, but the polarizer would be more useful most of the time). I also got an Epson R200, but that's a story for another time. Since the best part of digital photography is sharing pictures, I thought I'd do just that... :D
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/1381/new_lenses.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/1440/sheltie.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/1286/strawberry.jpg
http://www.dphoto.us/forumphotos/data/1440/insects.jpg
more...
makeup Rod Blagojevich
Ryall
10-09 05:42 PM
I agree with ilyas about the bottom typo.... I understand why you put it there, but from a design/art standpoint the picture would be better without it - IMO.
The main part is very cool though!
Peace :cowboy:
The main part is very cool though!
Peace :cowboy:
girlfriend Patricia Blagojevich, wife of
pappu
03-10 03:11 PM
You can always add corrections, You are the Admin!
Do not waste your time on soft LUDs
Do not waste your time on soft LUDs
hairstyles Patti Blagojevich, wife of
GCcomesoon
10-11 07:19 PM
Hi
My case was filed on June 4th , 2007 & till now I haven't got my FP notice & no update on the EAD application.I have called USCIS few times.They said sometimes it can take up to 6 months after 485 filing
Thanks
Priority date - 05/2003
140 approved - 10/2006 from TSC
485,131,765 RD-6/04/2007 at TSC, notices received - 06/07/2007
CA, EB2
Wife's case returned due to some error,send it again & received on 06/17/2007 as per Fedex
Wife's case RD- 7/10/2007
LUD in my case - I131 - 7/10/07 approved
LUD in my case - 1131,485,765, - 7/11/07
EAD for spouse - approved
FP done for spouse
EAD, FP - ????????
LUD in spouse's case - I131-7/11/07, approved
My case was filed on June 4th , 2007 & till now I haven't got my FP notice & no update on the EAD application.I have called USCIS few times.They said sometimes it can take up to 6 months after 485 filing
Thanks
Priority date - 05/2003
140 approved - 10/2006 from TSC
485,131,765 RD-6/04/2007 at TSC, notices received - 06/07/2007
CA, EB2
Wife's case returned due to some error,send it again & received on 06/17/2007 as per Fedex
Wife's case RD- 7/10/2007
LUD in my case - I131 - 7/10/07 approved
LUD in my case - 1131,485,765, - 7/11/07
EAD for spouse - approved
FP done for spouse
EAD, FP - ????????
LUD in spouse's case - I131-7/11/07, approved
Green Card Aspirant
05-01 12:05 AM
Congrats and enjoy your freedom of mobility
eb3_nepa
02-25 07:47 PM
Once a I140 is filed without the I485 one has to wait for I140 approval before being eigible for filing I485
Can you post any supporting documentation for this?
Thanks
Can you post any supporting documentation for this?
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment